The Case for Native Iceberg Catalog APIs and Unified Governance in Object Storage

Apache Iceberg is significantly transforming modern data lakes. Its introduction to object storage platforms has been celebrated for delivering ACID transactions, strong schema evolution, and warehouse-like reliability to data lake architectures. The Iceberg Catalog API standard is crucial to this transformation, as it ensures that various tools can consistently discover tables and execute atomic transactions once a compliant catalog service is established. This represents a significant achievement in interoperability.

Organizations often encounter a dual challenge as they move toward the widespread adoption of Iceberg. First, implementing the Iceberg Catalog API usually necessitates the deployment and management of separate external catalog services. This adds to operational complexity, much like setting up a JDBC metastore with a dedicated PostgreSQL database, which is required to enable the core functionalities of Iceberg.

Second, organizations must deal with a separate security model for this external catalog, which differs from the native identity and access management (IAM) controls applied to the underlying object storage data. This situation creates a significant governance implementation gap, resulting in a two-world problem for security, which transforms initial enthusiasm into a complex setup and ongoing administrative burden.

The current situation is not merely an inconvenience but a significant barrier to fully harnessing Iceberg's potential for agile and secure data lakehouses. This post advocates for a new approach: integrating not only unified governance but also the core functionality of the Iceberg Catalog API more directly within object storage platforms. We will discuss the importance of this deeper integration, which offers the catalog API directly, and why such integration is essential for creating truly simplified, secure, and manageable Iceberg ecosystems.

The Two Faces of Table Governance: Why Both Metadata and Data Control Are Indispensable

Mastering two crucial aspects of control is essential for building secure data lakehouses.

First, we need to focus on metadata governance, which is akin to managing the map and legend of your data landscape. In the context of Iceberg and its Catalog API standard, this entails overseeing who can discover the available tables, access the current structural definitions and states of those tables (including their schema, partitioning, and properties via the root metadata file), and, importantly, determine who has the authority to commit transactional state changes that update a table's metadata pointer.

Effective metadata governance, supported by the Iceberg Catalog API for discovery and transactions, is the foundation of a well-organized and easily discoverable Iceberg table.

Data governance revolves around protecting the valuable content within your data files, such as Parquet and ORC formats. It involves managing confidentiality (who can access sensitive data?), ensuring the integrity of the content (who can write to or delete data files?), and maintaining the availability of the data. Data governance is a crucial line of defense for your most important assets.

The critical link is their interdependence. While robust metadata governance is essential, it is insufficient without strong data governance. For instance, a user who has permission to know that a table called customer_financials exists (which falls under metadata control) should not automatically have the ability to access its sensitive contents (which falls under data control). On the other hand, strong permissions for object storage can be compromised if metadata controls are weak. Adequate data lake security only occurs when these two elements work together harmoniously. Unfortunately, this synergy is often disrupted by the fragmented manner in which they are typically managed today. So, how does this fragmentation translate into real-world challenges?

The Friction of Fragmentation: The Case Against Dispersed Models

One of the most pressing issues with the current approach is the administrative burden of managing multiple systems. Consider a common scenario: access to data files in Minio AIStor or any S3-compatible object storage is controlled by platform-specific IAM roles and policies. To utilize Iceberg's catalog features and manage table definitions, organizations often deploy a separate catalog service, such as a Hive Metastore. This service typically requires its own security model, such as Kerberos and Ranger, for fine-grained control, or relies on a JDBC-based catalog that depends on database permissions, forcing users to manage and secure the database.

As a result, it becomes a daunting task for administrators to oversee functionality and permissions across these various systems, increasing the likelihood of human error and inconsistency. This complexity escalates as the number of distinct components requiring deployment and the security complexity grow, which also demands greater expertise and can lead to more mistakes. Ultimately, simpler, more integrated systems are inherently easier to secure.

The current setup's fragmentation burdens administrators and negatively impacts developer experience and agility, leading to significant onboarding challenges. For a developer trying to create and query an Iceberg table on object storage, the initial setup can be unexpectedly complicated. In addition to requiring permissions for object storage, having an Iceberg catalog can introduce operational complexities, including setting up, configuring, and maintaining separate infrastructure, just to access basic API functionalities. These requirements for fundamental table operations create substantial barriers, which ultimately undermine the potential for agility in data lakes.

When catalog functionality and governance are spread across multiple, loosely connected systems, provisioning access becomes a complex and often manual process that requires the involvement of multiple teams. This complexity can lead to operational bottlenecks and make it extremely difficult to obtain a clear, consolidated view of who has what effective permissions on this logical table and its associated data. As a result, audits can feel like forensic investigations.

Moreover, these fragmented models significantly heighten security risks. Misalignments between policies defined in an external catalog and those at the object storage layer can lead to over-privileged access, unintended access denials, or outdated permissions. This troubling situation highlights the need for solutions that provide the Iceberg Catalog API, along with its governance, in a more unified and integrated manner. So, what might such a beneficial approach look like?

The Native Advantage: Envisioning Truly Unified Catalog APIs and Governance

Given the challenges of managing fragmented catalog deployment and governance, what if we could rethink our approach? Imagine if accessing the Iceberg Catalog API and managing Iceberg tables—both their metadata and data—felt less like a disjointed collection of tools and more like a seamless, integrated extension of the object storage’s services and security framework. This is the fundamental idea behind advocating for native integration.

A. Defining Natively Unified Catalog API and Governance

This design describes a system where the functionality of the Iceberg Catalog API is provided as a service that is natively integrated with the object storage system. The control planes for managing access to both table metadata and the underlying data files utilize the platform's established security features, including Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies. The key aspect of this design is to manage permissions for logical table entities in a way that consistently governs their definitions, interactions through the API, and physical data representations within a unified security framework. Essentially, this approach shifts from deploying and securing a separate catalog, then securing the storage, to using a native catalog service and securing the tables as a whole.

B. Guiding Principles of an Ideal System

An ideal system that incorporates native integration should adhere to several key principles:

First and foremost, it should leverage existing security features. By building on the robust Identity and Access Management (IAM) system of the object storage platform—using IAM as our primary example—we can utilize its maturity, scalability, and comprehensive feature set. Users are already familiar with these tools, which enhances usability.

Second, a comprehensive table abstraction for policy management is essential. The system should recognize an Iceberg table not merely as metadata pointers but as a logical entity intrinsically linked to its data. This allows for policies to be defined directly against the table itself within the IAM framework, simplifying policy creation.

Third, the integration should facilitate efficient yet powerful policy management. For instance, a single IAM policy statement granting read-only access to Table_X could intuitively encompass both the necessary metadata discovery API calls and the permissions for reading data files. At the same time, advanced administrators should still have the ability to define separate, fine-grained controls if needed.

Finally, a key objective is to reduce the operational footprint. By closely integrating core Iceberg Catalog API functionality and governance with the object storage layer, we can minimize the need to deploy, manage, and independently secure separate metastore services and databases.

C. The Upsides: A More Secure, Simpler, and Agile Data Lake

Embracing these principles offers several significant advantages. First, it enhances security through consistent policy application and clearer audit trails. It also simplifies administration by operating within a familiar security framework and improves agility, allowing data teams to gain secure access more quickly. 

 Additionally, the concept of a natively provided catalog API, secured by integrated Identity and Access Management (IAM), represents a substantial advancement. 

But what would this look like in practice?

Anchored in Storage: The True Foundation of Your Data Lake

The official Iceberg REST API includes a core set of essential operations for basic table management. By implementing this standardized subset of the API directly within the object storage layer, we achieve an optimal balance. This approach delivers the most critical day-to-day functionality while minimizing the operational and security overhead associated with deploying a separate, full-featured catalog service. The integrated core approach significantly lowers the barrier to entry, enabling teams to become productive with Iceberg quickly.

Integrating transactional catalog operations into object storage requires an object storage system designed for high-performance metadata and data input/output. A high-performance object store ensures that these integrated operations are fast and reliable at scale, preventing storage from becoming a bottleneck. This approach need not replace advanced external catalogs; instead, it complements them. Teams can begin with the straightforward, secure, and efficient integrated core, all without needing to migrate their data from its high-performance foundation.

In an AI-first world, this approach becomes increasingly essential. As machine-generated data grows into hundreds of petabytes and even exabytes, Iceberg is establishing itself as the leading open standard for managing structured data within object storage. At such massive scales, the ability of the underlying infrastructure to deliver on cost, performance, and simplicity is no longer just a feature—it is the key factor for success. Therefore, at Minio, we are very excited about the next frontier for Iceberg: a future where a deeply integrated core, built on a robust foundation, can unlock unprecedented levels of scale and simplicity.

The Case for a Natively Integrated Future in Data Lake Management

The journey of data within an Iceberg-powered data lake that utilizes object storage can be transformative. However, this potential is often limited by the challenges associated with deploying, managing, and governing external catalog services alongside the permissions required for object storage. This fragmented approach can lead to increased complexity, higher operational overhead, and security vulnerabilities.

There is a strong case for enhancing the integration of Iceberg Catalog API functionality and its governance within object storage platforms. This integration is driven by a vision of simplicity, consistency, and improved security. By leveraging and enhancing the existing security features of the platform, such as AWS IAM for Amazon S3 tables, we can significantly reduce the barriers to establishing transparent and effective governance for both metadata and data.

The focus extends beyond just administrative convenience; it aims to create a more secure, agile, and reliable foundation for data-driven enterprises. While achieving a universally perfect and natively integrated solution presents challenges, the path forward is becoming clearer. The evolution of data lake platforms must prioritize deep integration, making catalog functionality and governance essential components rather than mere afterthoughts. A future where Iceberg data lakes are both powerful and seamlessly governed is not only achievable—it represents the next logical step forward.

Please feel free to reach out to us at hello@min.io or on our Slack.